Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
Medical Laboratory Technology Journal is a peer-reviewed e-journal that published original research papers, review articles and case studies focused on the development of medical laboratory sciences, especially those related to tropical diseases. It covers the parasitology, bacteriology, virology, hematology, clinical chemistry, toxicology, food and drink chemistry, and any sciences (see : Aim and Scope).
MLTJ is committed to upholding the integrity of the academic record. We encourage authors to refer to the Committee on Publication Ethics’ International Standards for Authors and view the Publication Ethics page on the Dashboard.
This journal follows hints from Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in going through all components of book ethics and, in particular, a way to take care of instances of studies and book misconduct. All articles on this journal related to human topics need to recognize ideas of studies ethics as defined in Declaration of Helsinki and research related to animals need to obey the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research as evolved through the Council for International Organization of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). Medical Laboratory Technology Journal adapts COPE to satisfy excessive excellent popular of ethics for writer, editors, authors, and reviewers. As an critical issue, book ethics desires to be defined truely to enhance the excellent of the studies worldwide. In this part, we provide an explanation for the same old for editors, authors, and reviewers. In addition, writer do now no longer have proper to intrude with the integrity of the contents and most effective aid to post in well timed manner.
The editor is responsible for all articles published in the Medical Laboratory Technology Journal.
The editor should help the author follow the author's instructions adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
Editors can contact other editors or reviewers to make the final decision.
Editors should evaluate the quality of each author, regardless of nationality, ethnicity, political beliefs, race, religion, gender, seniority, or institution, and objectively evaluate the manuscript for publication. If there is a potential conflict of interest in, he / she should decline his / her assignment.
Editors need to make sure that the document sent to the reviewer does not contain information from the author. The reverse is also true.
The editor's decision should be communicated to the author along with the reviewer's comments, unless it contains offensive or defamatory remarks.
Editors must respect the author's request not to review a post if it is appropriate and feasible for an individual to review it.
Editors and all employees must ensure the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts. If fraud is suspected, or if the author's objection is suspected, the editor will follow the COPE flowchart.
Reviewers should comment on ethical issues and possible misconduct in research and publishing.
The reviewer should complete the work in a timely manner, and should notify the editor if the work cannot be completed.
Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of their manuscripts.
Reviewers may not accept peer review of manuscripts if there is a potential conflict of interest between the reviewer and the author.
The author states that the material has not been previously published and has not otherwise assigned rights to the article.
The author must ensure the originality of the work and properly cite the work of others according to the reference format.
Authors must not participate in plagiarism or self-theft.
Publishing salami is strictly prohibited in Medical Laboratory Technology Journal.
Authors must ensure that they are adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and follow the author criteria outlined in the Medical Laboratory Technology Journal Instructions to Authors. The author does not suggest any personal information that may identify the patient in the form of descriptive parts, photographs, or pedigree.If the patient's picture is essential and essential for scientific information, the author has written consent and articulated this.
In the case of human experimentation, the authors have demonstrated that the research process complies with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and the national and international committees that direct human experimentation.If in doubt whether the study was conducted in accordance with the statement, the author should explain. For animal testing, the authors have confirmed that they follow national and international guidelines for laboratory animal testing.
If there is any suspicion of data tampering or forgery, the author should provide the publisher with the date and details of the work.
Journal authors need to clarify everything that can cause conflicts of interest, such as: B. Labor, research, consultant costs and intellectual property in the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form disclosure document.